On enough

The Stoics drew a sharp line between what is necessary and what is merely desired. Epictetus, who owned almost nothing for most of his life, argued that the person who has trained their wants to be small is freer than the person with vast holdings and a restless appetite for more. The first is hard to disturb. The second is permanently exposed.

This is not an argument for poverty. The Stoics called external things like wealth indifferent: not bad, not required, fine to have and use well. The point is about where your sense of sufficiency lives. If it depends on the next acquisition, it will always live one step ahead of you. If it lives in having clarified what you actually need, it is available now, with what you already have.